> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Michael Everson
> >Sorry, that doesn't cut it, IMO. You know all too well that "what > >people need to encode" is open to lots of interpretations. When > >someone comes along and says "we need to encode Devanagari ksha" or > >"we need to encode ch", you, Michael Everson, will respond saying, > >"No, we do not need to encode those things," > > Because they can be represented in plain text already. So, you have a principle for deciding about "ch"; do you have a principle for deciding about technical notations? Peter Peter Constable Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies Microsoft Windows Division
