Hi Rick, On Thursday, March 04, 2004 6:56 PM, Rick Cameron va escriure:
> Woo-hoo! Finally, a real answer, I am sorry for you, but when one posts to some high-volume mailing list, he should expect a rather bad signal/noise ratio; this is often seen as an opportunity to get some really good answers from people that usually you did not think about; on the other hand, there are always a number of answers, or even part of posts, that are unuseful, and some even misleading. Another view is that these high-volume lists are set up to give opportunity for a lot of readers to learn things. In this sense, I believe some people did learn things about how to manage Unicode datas with C. I hope they were not too much misleaded, though. > rather than speculation. <snip> > -----Original Message----- > From: Ienup Sung [..] <snip> > I'm also quite sure all major Unix/Linux systems support the > functions that I mentioned. (I also believe majority will support > UTF-32BE, UTF-32LE and such variations too in the iconv() code > conversions by the way.) > > Additionally, since POSIX defines wchar_t as an opaque data type, we > hope that people are using the std C interfaces to do conversions > between wchar_t and multibyte characters if possible. I also saw speculations in Mr Ienup Sung's post... Looks like it is human nature, I'd say. Antoine
