"Peter Constable" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Unicode encodes characters, not orthographic functions.
And the character is a th ligature. Why do the fine details of how that's drawn in various unstandardized phonetic alphabets make more difference than the huge variations in the g's used in Latin alphabets? If we worry about variation selectors here, why not with Runic? In this case, unlike Runic, it is unimportant which character is used, and I would be surprised if anybody really cares about the fine details. -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
