Curtis Clark wrote, > on 2004-03-18 01:05 Pavel Adamek wrote: > > So it would be convenient to have an empty diacritical mark, > > (COMBINING NOTHING ABOVE) > > which would cause the "soft" dot of <j> or <i> to disappear, > > without adding anything else. > > Assuming this could be added to any other character, my mind boggles at > the implications, both for decomposition and for rendering. :-)
The glyph could look like the old Pac-Man video game. It should remain visible until it has consumed the applicable diacritic, then vanish. Best regards, James Kass
