> Fine. I concede that this is the case. Therefore, let's change the > underlying > form of <0069> to a dotless "i" and let English speakers change it to a > dotted > "i" with the font.
I am happy to inform you that "the underlying form" doesn't have a dot. -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "�it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt
