On 11/05/2004 05:44, Patrick Andries wrote:
Peter Kirk a Ãcrit :
And these two cases are hardly a good advertisement for the expert's
reputation. The Coptic/Greek unification proved to be ill-advised and
is being undone.
I'm rather surprised by this comment. If the Coptic/Greek unification
proved to be ill-advised how could you defend what I see, if I recall
properly, as your (original ?) position : Phoenician/Hebrew unification ?
P. A.
Because each such case has to be judged on its individual merits,
according to proper justification and user requirements. There can be no
hard rules like "always split" or "always join".
--
Peter Kirk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
http://www.qaya.org/
