Peter Kirk scripsit:

> I support Coptic disunification on the grounds that it was requested by 
> the user community. Initially I opposed Phoenician disunification 
> because there was no evidence of demand for it from users. As such 
> evidence has now been produced, I now support Phoenician disunification, 
> according to Michael Everson's proposal. Please note carefully this last 
> sentence.

I agree entirely.

-- 
John Cowan  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  www.reutershealth.com  www.ccil.org/~cowan
Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration
is exchanged. So it was at King's Bench in common law England; so it was
under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than
two centuries of jurisprudence in this country; and so it is today. 
       --Specht v. Netscape

Reply via email to