> I fully agree. "Featural" is a description orthogonal to considerations > like "alphabet" or "syllabary" or "printed in green ink" for that > matter. I was just running off with talking about other orthographies > which could be described as featural, whatever else the are (note that > VS and Lhoerr are alphabets, and tengwar is probably closest to an > abjad, in most modes)
OK, good. You had me worried for a moment. :-) Peter
