> From: Mark E. Shoulson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


> Actually, no: some accents go on unstressed syllables.  For example, a
> dehi could coexist with a qamats-qatan.  Psalms 4:2 has a qamats-qatan
> on the same letter as GERESH MUQDAM, as do others.  Psalms 9:14 has
one
> with a DEHI.  Exodus 34:11 has one with a QADMA.
> 
> But a *pair* of qamatses, one of each sort?  That wouldn't happen.

Precisely why assigning qamats qatan to class 18 would not be
particularly useful: it allows you to distinguish < qamats, qamats qatan
> from < qamats qatan, qamats >; it does not allow you to distinguish
differently-ordered sequences of qamats qatan and any other combining
marks with a non-zero class.



Peter Constable


Reply via email to