On 2004.04.27, 07:41, Cristian Secar� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On the other hand, a passive presence of a valid [extremely rarely
> used] character that can be obtained by an <existing_dead_key> +
> <existing_character_on_keyboadr> is not such a catastrophic thing
> either,

OTOH, it seems to be a good thing, IMHO. In the usual pt-PT keyboard,
f.i., we have five dead keys (�`�~^) and these support a lot of
characters that are NOT used in Portuguese spelling: ������������.

Indeed all combinations of those five combining characters with any
base letter present in ISO:8859-1 are implemented, allowing for
correct spelling of French, Italian, Dutch and English, plus also
Castillian (but for "��") and German (but for "�").

Nothing catastrophic about this!

P.S.: With Keyman I extended this to all possible combinations (using
precomposed Unicode chars when avaliable, for the time being), adding
also other diacriticals (hacheck, brachia, macron etc) to RAlt + dead
keys. Too bad Keyman still messes the NumPad for pt-PT keyboards. :-(

--                                                                ____.
Ant�nio MARTINS-Tuv�lkin                                         |  ()|
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                        |####|
PT-1XXX-XXX LISBOA                       N�o me invejo de quem tem    |
+351 934 821 700                         carros, parelhas e montes    |
http://www.tuvalkin.web.pt/bandeira/     s� me invejo de quem bebe    |
http://pagina.de/bandeiras/              a �gua em todas as fontes    |


Reply via email to