TUS4 describes “featural syllabary” as a script in which the symbols represent syllables, but (unlike non-featural syllabaries) the syllabic symbols “are not atomic; they can be built up out of parts that have a consistent relationship to the phonological parts of the syllable.”

 

I’m not sure how well this works, but at least the name can, I think, be improved upon: given that definition, perhaps “analytic syllabary” (as opposed to a “fusional” syllabary) would be a better label.

 

 

 

Peter Constable

Reply via email to