At 06:39 -0700 2004-04-30, Peter Constable wrote:
Has it struck anyone else that it might make best sense to consider Fraser just an extension of Latin -- so we just need to encode the turned capitals? Or is there more to it I'm not thinking about?
Evidence (or lack thereof) suggests that Fraser doesn't participate in the normal behaviour of Latin, including its glyph variation, its cursivity in writing, its casing behaviour, even italicization as opposed to obliquity.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
