Andrew C. West scripsit: > It does ? I thought that the whole point of much of the recent discussion was > the uncertainty of how Ogham should be laid out in vertically formatted text, > such as when embedded in Mongolian or vertical Chinese.
What's uncertain is whether a lr or a rl progression is favored, given the paucity of evidence. Michael favors lr progression. There is no question that the text is read BTT. -- "They tried to pierce your heart John Cowan with a Morgul-knife that remains in the http://www.ccil.org/~cowan wound. If they had succeeded, you would http://www.reutershealth.com become a wraith under the domination of the Dark Lord." --Gandalf
