Title: RE: [BULK] - Re: problems in Public Review 33 UTF Conversion Code Update

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Philippe Verdy
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 4:21 PM

> However I feel it's not legal (or really not recommanded) to encode non-
> character codepoints xFFFE-xFFFF where x is any plane number. So the rules
> need to be a bit more detailed to exclude them.

        Why do we need special rules to not encode characters that don't exist? 


/|/|ike

Reply via email to