John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth dot com> wrote: > Consequently, random pages that happen to be in non-Unicode charsets > are getting mis-served and mis-displayed. The site will probably > revert to having no default as a result, which is a great pity.
I'm sure this is a dumb question, but why would there be any pages in non-Unicode charsets on the Unicode Web site? -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
