> As things now stand, Ogham must be wrapped in RLO...PDF brackets when > mixed with vertical Han or Mongolian.
Yes, that's true -- and I don't see any reason why people can't live with that... Those are the kinds of reasons we have the explicit controls. Mark __________________________________ http://www.macchiato.com â ààààààààààààààààààààà â ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Cowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Mike Ayers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, 2004 May 27 21:26 Subject: Re: [BULK] - Re: Vertical BIDI > Mark Davis scripsit: > > > What the Bidi Algorithm says both of these is at: > > > > http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/#Vertical_Text > > However, it does not specify the treatment of Ogham embedded in TTB > text, since Ogham is the only script with both a required horizontal > direction (LTR) and a required vertical one (BTT). > > As things now stand, Ogham must be wrapped in RLO...PDF brackets when > mixed with vertical Han or Mongolian. > > -- > One art / There is John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > No less / No more http://www.reutershealth.com > All things / To do http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > With sparks / Galore -- Douglas Hofstadter >
