The reports page wasn't updated -- sorry. As to the UTS, when CLDR came into Unicode, we decided to have it and associated UTS's in a separate committee (LTC), since its scope was sufficiently different from the UTC's. http://www.unicode.org/reports/about-reports.html was updated to reflect this change.
If you could look over http://www.unicode.org/cldr/ (and associated) and let me know where there are places the text could be clarified, I'd appreciate it (you're one of the most thorough reviewers!). Mark __________________________________ http://www.macchiato.com â ààààààààààààààààààààà â ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Constable" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tue, 2004 Jun 08 10:09 Subject: RE: New versions of the Common Locale Data Repository (CLDR 1.1) > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf > > Of Rick McGowan > > > > The Unicode(r) Consortium announced today the release of new versions > of the > > Common Locale Data Repository (CLDR 1.1) and the Locale Data Markup > > Language specification (LDML 1.1), > > I'm confused: at http://www.unicode.org/cldr/, technical report #35 is > referred to as an unqualified Unicode Technical Standard, whereas at > http://www.unicode.org/reports/index.html it's referred to as a draft. > What's the status of this thing? I've looked through minutes from the > last five meetings and can find no reference to this. > > I'm wondering mainly because I've been concerned at some of the text in > one portion of the draft and expected to see it some up on a UTC agenda, > but it hasn't shown up so far. > > > > Peter > > Peter Constable > Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies > Microsoft Windows Division > > >
