> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of John Cowan
> [T]he Unicode Standard does not encode idiosyncratic, > personal, novel, or private use characters [...]. What about Bell's Visible Speech? (I'm sure I've seen it discussed here on on qalam, but I've no recollection what might have been said.) I don't know what Bell might have published, but they were also used by Sweet: Sweet, Henry. 1906. A primer of phonetics. 3rd edn., revised. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Would you consider these too idiosyncratic? Peter Constable
