I'm new to this, so I'm not sure the best way to move forward, but let me try two ways:
1. The Euro symbol is a logo of the new European currency. 2. The (cc) symbol is not trademarked, so there is not the kind of IP issue as their would be around "usual" logos. 3. If there were a "cc" character that could be enclosed by an enclosing circle character, then the symbol could be composed from Unicode characters. Thus, there would be no logo per se, but a means to construct what we want to make a symbol, by usage and acclaim, not a logo. But this would be less elegant than a single (cc) character because, as the enclosing characters page says, YMMV when using these enclosing symbols. Is that a start? M On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 16:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Michael Tiemann scripsit: > > > Without getting greedy, I'd like to propose the adoption of the (cc) > > symbol in whatever way would be most expedient (so that creative commons > > authors can identify their work more appropriately), and leave for later > > the question of the other symbols. > > It's a logo. We normally don't do logos.
