E. Keown wrote:
Right, I was also thinking about what else needs to be added. I'm looking at an old version of one of your proposals (likely out of date), and the only things I see in that one that I think need to be considered are the "KETIV/QERE" symbols you have listed. We do need to discuss those (on the Hebrew list).Elaine Keown Tucson
Dear Rick and List and Peter K. and Mark Shoulson and Michael Everson and John Hudson:
You need to look at Unicode 4.0 as well. There are
30 codepoints not encoded within the Hebrew block on "05" of the Roadmap. Nothing *else* is currently proposed for allocation to Hebrew. If a
Peter and Mark and Michael and John wrote proposals
for more Tiberian Hebrew to add to the 05 Hebrew
block. There are ~10 more possible Tiberian thingies
to add not yet proposed. So that leaves 20 code
points minus whatever is accepted from Peter/Mark/
Michael/John's 2004 proposals.
I'm looking to see if I have any other old proposals of yours. I would like to get a proposal together for Babylonian vocalization; that definitely needs to be encoded. Did you say there was also a Palestinian vocalization system to be done? We need to find out about them. Those proposals probably should be bounced off Prof. Dotan if possible; you said he was an expert on this.
I have already done some pretty extensive research on Samaritan, and I am waiting to hear from my own experts regarding what I have for that so far (I need to send some email about that today); we'll see what we can come up with for that.
~mark
