On 29/06/2004 16:07, busmanus wrote:

I have a (hopefully) short question about "polytonic" Greek support.
Does anyone know what the idea was behind encoding Greek vowel+acute
combinations (without apirates, etc.) twice: first in the Basic
Greek section as vowel+tonos, for the second time in the Extended
Greek section as vowel+oxia? What is the recommended usage for
Classical Greek (and why is it better)?

If you prefer to use precomposed characters (rather than separate diacritics as Ken suggested) or need to do so to meet W3C recommendations, you should use the ones in the Extended Greek section, which allow for a distinction between acute and grave accents which is important for Classical Greek.

You may like to look at Nick Nicholas' Greek Unicode site at http://ptolemy.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis/unicode/unicode.html, which discusses these issues.

--
Peter Kirk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
http://www.qaya.org/




Reply via email to