W liście z wto, 10-08-2004, godz. 18:33 +0100, Jon Hanna napisał:

> By the rules of XML replacing ≯ with U+226F would mean the document was
> no longer well-formed.

Really? I don't have a XML spec handy, but character references like
̸ can't be processed before parsing tags, because &60; is the
literal character "<", not the start of a tag.

-- 
   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk
   \__/       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    ^^     http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/



Reply via email to