Sinnathurai Srivas <sisrivas at blueyonder dot co dot uk> wrote: > Could you include the followin. > > 1/ > Why even after about 20 years of existence, the unicode is not > supported by any significant software and applications? > > 2/ > What if ISO-8859-X for any one who wanted it be allowed to exist (as a > standard) in parallel, while Unicode learns and matures it's too > advanced, but difficult technology. > > 3/ > In the name of promoting Unicode, are we holdingback multilingual > computing for the next 10 years or so?
And you guys thought I couldn't spot a troll. Ha. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
