Asmus Freytag writes: > Given > the nature of the symbol in question, I would personally see no reason to > object > to encoding it - especially given the current and projected lack of > availability > of other alternatives.
It's a simple combining character. Even if you can't do arbitrary circles around characters, you can take one character sequence and map it to the glyph in a font. Systems that can't do even that need to be fixed. -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
