> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
> Of Asmus Freytag
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 9:01 PM


> Functionally, the symbol is not a breve. Visually, the sample does not
look
> like a standard breve, and the font resource cited matches the style
of the
> sample according to the contributor who cited it, implying that there
well
> may be a particular conventional shape to this symbol. Finally, the
mark is
> not placed above the 'b'... 

> The other is the question of whether a unification with the double
breve 
> (i.e. a breve that spans two characters)...

Obviously, it's U+0E31 :-)



Peter
 
Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division


Reply via email to