People get different things out of the printed book; I personally don't need the code charts; I always look at online versions. But many people find printed charts very useful; de gustibus non disputandum est.
As to the comments; this may seem recursive, but if you file an online report requesting feedback, it will be taken up at the UTC. âMark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Theo Veenker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "unicode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 01:41 Subject: Re: Public Review Issues Update > Mark Davis wrote: > > All comments are reviewed at the next UTC meeting. Due to the volume, we > > don't reply to each and every one what the disposition was. If actions were > > taken, they are recorded in the minutes of the meetings. > > But what if an action was not taken. Do I have to keep reporting a particular > problem until it's gone? Also, there is no way of telling which problems > already have been reported a dozen times before. Assuming the comments > reported are archived, why can't this archive be made accessible to the > unicode list? > > Theo > > > P.S. > > I know the Unicode Consortium is a non-profit organization and you are all > very very busy, and I look up to the people behind it. But I often find > it hard to see the part where the Unicode Consortium is actually promoting > use of the Unicode Standard. Sometimes it almost seems to discourage > developers to use the Standard. Take the Book for instance, one is not > allowed to print the online version, so I bought the book to find out > that 2 of its 3 kilograms is just tables of glyphs which could have been > on a CD. So you pay $75 to get value for $25. > > >
