And, as always happens when you finally break down and publicly post a question, the answer just jumps out at you. In a "duh" momend, I re-read <http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr10/#S2.1.2>
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:04:16 -0500, Clark Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was looking over the allkeys.txt file, as well as the conformance > tests for the UCA, and one thing has me a bit confused. > > In CollationTest_NON_IGNORABLE.txt, the sequence (U+0410, U+0062) > collates before (U+0430 U+0306 U+0334). However, if the latter is > normalized to NFD, shouldn't it be normalized to (U+0430 U+0334 > U+0306), as U+0334 (i.e. 1) has a lower combining class than U+0306 > (i.e. 230)? However, if that's the case, then the key it generates > collates *before* (U+0410, U+0062). > > Obviously, I am missing something; probably something staring me in > the face, but I can't, for the life of me figure it out. > > -- > Clark S. Cox III > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.livejournal.com/users/clarkcox3/ > http://homepage.mac.com/clarkcox3/ > -- Clark S. Cox III [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.livejournal.com/users/clarkcox3/ http://homepage.mac.com/clarkcox3/
