On 21/11/2004 23:02, Edward H. Trager wrote:
...
Are you saying the difference in names is "SIL Ezra" vs. "Ezra SIL" ?
That's too confusing!
Confusing, but true.
When I gave the URL, I checked that it was referring to an "OpenType" font --and since it was OpenType, I assumed that it was the newer version with a Unicode CMAP. If SIL still has links to legacy non-Unicode versions of fonts which now also have Unicode versions, then they should make this really clear to people. My apologies if I provided the wrong URL.
No, you provided the right URL, but the wrong font name.
For reference:
For the Unicode font Ezra SIL, go to http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&id=EzraSIL_Home. Do use this for web pages, but Hebrew accents may not display properly on some systems.
For the legacy font SIL Ezra, go to http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=SILEzra. Don't use this for web pages because it doesn't work with IE6. The situation is clearly explained at this URL.
-- Peter Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] (personal) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) http://www.qaya.org/
