Christopher Fynn wrote, > Large "Pan-Unicode" fonts like "Arial Unicode MS" usually do not contain > proper OpenType tables and ligatures for *all* the scripts the font > covers. For example "Arial Unicode MS" and "Code 2000" contain glyphs > for Tibetan script but they *do not* contain the OpenType GSUB and GPOS > lookups necessary to display Tibetan correctly.
Code2000 does not contain Tibetan glyphs. But, Code2000 *is* an OpenType font and has *many* OpenType tables in it which help to support several of the complex scripts which the font does cover -- like Tamil, Bengali, and Devanagari. Best regards, James Kass
