I cannot but agree. Sincerely,
Erkki I. Kolehmainen Tilkankatu 12 A 3, FI-00300 Helsinki, Finland Puh. (09) 4368 2643, 0400 825 943; Tel. +358 9 4368 2643, +358 400 825 943 -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Everson Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:41 PM To: Unicode Discussion Subject: Re: Preparing a proposal for encoding a portable interpretable object code into Unicode (from Re: IUC 34 - call for participation open until May 26) On 2 Jun 2010, at 10:51, William_J_G Overington wrote: > Well, that might well be the case historically, yet then the emoji > were invented and they were encoded. The emoji existed at the time > that they were encoded, yet they did not exist at the time that the > standards were started. The characters to which you refer are used in the context of Japanese telephony, and are graphic characters. As Andrew pointed out, you are wasting your time and ours. "There is absolutely NO CHANCE that the UTC or WG2 will accept (or even waste their time discussing) your proposal as it is totally out of scope for character encoding standards." Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
