Thanks Peter - I removed Verdana.

A.

On 10/28/2010 07:06 AM, Peter Constable wrote:

In the subtitle where “atvīkė̄” occurs, the Verdana font is being used; Verdana is left out of the styling on the following line:

<divstyle="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 160%;">Svēkė atvīkė̄ i Vikipedėjė <ahref="/wiki/%C5%BDemaitiu_kalba"title="Žemaitiu kalba">žemaitiu kalbuo</a>,</div>

<divstyle="padding: 2px 0 0 20px; margin: 0; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 90%;">encikluopedėjė, katra gal redagoutė kuožnos nuorontis.</div>

Verdana does not support U+0304. Arial, however has supported it since Windows Vista.

The word “Vielībė̄jė” in the navigation bar appears to be formatted with Arial. It displays correctly on Windows.

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Arns Udovice
*Sent:* Monday, October 25, 2010 1:09 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Samogitian E with dot above and macron

Hello all,

On 2010-06-30 change became effective for Samogitian (http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=sgs). There are one letter which has many problems with rendering. It is E/e with dot above and macron (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/bat-smg/0/0f/E_smg.jpg). You can see it in:
http://bat-smg.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C4%97rms_poslapis
atvīk*ė̄* or Vielīb*ė̅*jė. On Linux it is shown (in different shrifts) as „ė“ with macron between dot and letter or „ė“ with minus near letter (see attachment). On Windows macron is shown as box (or I haven't any good shrift). For now all writers use shrift with additional letter, ex. ftp://ftp.akl.lt/sriftai/Vytis/Naujas_Vytis/Vytis_1.002/ . Simple user don't use this letter - writes 'atvīk*ėė*' or 'atvīk*ėn*', even 'atvīk*ėi*', but it is against rules. This letter was introduced in 1998 in Samogitian writing book „Žemaičių rašyba“ (Samogitian writing) (/ISBN/: 998692071X). Latter it was used in all Samogitian books. Try to use in IT is complicated. What I should to do what this letter come to unicode? As I read in http://www.unicode.org/pending/proposals.html it is better to deal about it in this thread at first.

Best regards,
Arns Udovīčė

Reply via email to