On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:56 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > [Applies to: SMP Roadmap 6.0.7; http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/smp/] > [Mainly aimed at people who can change roadmaps] > [I used online feedback form, but got no responce, so reposting it here.]
When you use the online feedback form your feedback will be officially noted. You may not get a response, but it will be noted. The same does not apply to postings on the Unicode list. (See for example I am responding but I am not a Unicode official so there is no guarantee that it is noted for the record.) > There are 6 small gaps in 'Brahmic scripts' section of SMP, which are quite > useless I think. They can be easily united to form 3 larger gaps, in which > new scripts can fit. > If you think it is premature because block sizes can change, I'd propose at > least move Tirhuta as it'll be too late when it is allocated. Moving Tirhuta is a good idea. > I think those small gaps will hardly ever be filled with extensions to > already encoded Brahmic scripts. Actually the SMP Brahmic script allocations, especially for old epigraphical scripts like Chola, Box Headed etc are highly tentative except for Grantha which is 99.9% confirmed so it is not possible to predict that they will *not* be used. -- Shriramana Sharma
