interesting

after banging on about the need to adhere to Unicode annexes, &c, and not 
withstanding the comment that "the characters in this block are intended for 
symbols used in mathematical notation", Christiansen uses characters from the 
Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols block for visual effect alone

still, intentions are one thing, and actual practice another  --  like many of 
us, he probably feels free to ignore a standard's specifications when they feel 
restrictive

I seem to remember Doug Ewell asking for actual examples of the use of 
Mathematical Alphanumeric Symbols being used as intended  --  presumably these 
slides don't count as the first such instance..?


all the same, a very interesting presentation   . . .   /phil chastney



________________________________
From: Karl Williamson <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 9:01 PM
Subject: Slide show: Survey of current programming language support for Unicode

Tom Christiansen recently gave a talk at the OSCON conference concerning the 
varying levels of support for Unicode in some current programming languages.  
It is accessible via this link

http://training.perl.com/OSCON2011/index.html

The talk is entitled "Unicode Support Shootout", and is is one of three talks 
listed there, the other two being Perl specific.  I recommend the html slide 
show version, from this link,

http://98.245.80.27/tcpc/OSCON2011/gbu.html

Left-click to advance to the next slide in the sequence.

Reply via email to