> At this point, regarding the dammas in question, it is a matter > instead of providing appropriate documentation of equivalence > (or non-equivalence) in use and explaining when one might want > to use one variant or another in text.
> --Ken Have I not shown clearly that there is not a normal damma used by Arabs and in the Philippines and a RIGHT ARROWHEAD used by West Africans for the same purpose, but that damma has a continum if shapes from a small-waw-shape to a angular shape. When you add to that the clear statement by Kew and others that the West African language communities using the RIGHT ARROWHEAD as a glyph variant of damma, this nonsense should be stopped whatever stage it has reached, should it not?
<<attachment: maghrib_damma.jpg>>
