On 19 Aug 2011, at 16:31, Mark E. Shoulson wrote: > On 08/19/2011 11:03 AM, Shriramana Sharma wrote: >> >> In effect, changing the existing BC=L to ON is no worse than changing it to >> R. > > I think making the directionality of the PUA "L" instead of "ON" was a > mistake in the first place, yes, but does even the PUA fall under the > commandment "Thou shalt not change what is already encoded"? Even though it > isn't encoded? That is, my understanding is that we *can't* change the PUA > to ON now, but that there is a suggestion that some *new* hunk of PUA be > created that is R, in order to balance the existing L. Is that right?
Yes, that is the suggestion. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
