On 21 Aug 2011, at 02:44, Doug Ewell wrote: > Would that really be a better default? I thought the main RTL needs for the > PUA would be for unencoded scripts, not for even more Arabic letters.
Could easily be for work on new Arabic-script orthographies which use new letters. Or for similar scripts that treat numbers as Arabic does. > (How many more are there anyway?) No one knows. :-) Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
