On Tuesday, August 23, 2011 10:29:58 PM Philippe Verdy wrote: > 2011/8/24 Doug Ewell <[email protected]>: > > (3) which contains the same PUA code point with two meanings > The only numbered item to sacifice is number (3) here. that's the case > where separate PUA agreements are still coordinated so that they don't > use the same PUA assignments. This is the case of PUA greements in the > Conscript registry.
Too bad the Conscript registry is censoring assignments the maintainer doesn't like for unspecified personal reasons, increasing the chances of an overlap.
