> It would have the advantage of suppressing those names from the
> proposed table for UTR #25 (characters used in Mathematical
> notations).
>
> In the merged name aliases table, we could as well include :
> - SGML/HTML/XML character entity names (and some standardized synonyms) ?
HTML character entity names would be nice to have, but it would rather
make sense to have them in a separate file.
> - Postscript names (from AGL), also used in the "name" table of
> TrueType/OpenType fonts
> - possibly even their Postscript numeric id's (the 256 first names
> from the AGL list is not even stored in fonts, where they are bound
> only by string id).
I don't see why these should go into the unicode tables...
> - other names from candidate standards ?
What I'm really missing is the "filename" of the latest ("authoritative")
proposal appropriate for the character. I think even that unicode
should publish officially and for the broader these proposal as
they are very good starting point for people who wish to learn more
about particular codepoint / script.
> -- Philippe.
--
Petr Tomasek <http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek>
Jabber: [email protected]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EA 355:001 DU DU DU DU
EA 355:002 TU TU TU TU
EA 355:003 NU NU NU NU NU NU NU
EA 355:004 NA NA NA NA NA
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
