James, you might want to review (at least) the OFL: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIL_Open_Font_License, a license specifically created for fonts, created with freedoms in mind. In several respects it fits fonts much better than GPLv3.
/Sz On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 18:12, James Kass <[email protected]> wrote: > I rather would stick with GPLv3, simply because more permissive license > threatens freedom. For example, someone may take over my fonts, develop > them further, and subsequently change their license to something > commercial-only. It is what I want to avoid. Just something like stories > known from MACOS X, initially Berkeley-licensed-software derivative, > finally commercialized product. > > > James Kass >
