Hello Ben, I remember that issue as well, and we had solved it at font level through OpenType feature <case> and by creating a non-unicoded glyph for the "LATIN CAPITAL LETTER KRA" that is made of <004B, 2018> (that is LEFT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK -not apostrophe). I think it would be useful (if not productive) to add at least a name sequence for the uppercase of <0138>.
J. On 3 Mar 2012, at 22:32, Benjamin M Scarborough wrote: > I remember reading long ago that a capital counterpart of U+0138 LATIN SMALL > LETTER KRA had been proposed, but was rejected because it could be > represented as (I believe it was) the sequence <U+004B LATIN CAPITAL LETTER > K, U+02BC MODIFIER LETTER APOSTROPHE>. Unfortunately, I can't find the > details now, so I'm not sure if that's the right sequence, but it was > something like that. > > But the real point I'm getting at is: would it be productive to add a LATIN > CAPITAL LETTER KRA named sequence for <004B, 02BC>? > > —Ben Scarborough > > >
