On 4/3/2012 6:57 PM, Karl Williamson wrote:
Is it an error on the web site that this policy was in effect in 2.0, and it really should be 3.0? (as there no such decompositions in the data files starting in 3.0).
Yes.
Or were these data files defective?
No. The research to determine how far back some of the policies applied missedthe fact that this particular invariant for decomposition mappings was introduced
as of Unicode 3.0 instead of Unicode 2.0. The documentation will be fixed. --Ken
