On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 21:09, Ken Whistler <[email protected]> wrote: > I would suggest that the folks working on Ada 2012 (presumably a new > edition of ISO/IEC 8652:1995) get themselves an > updated copy of 10646, and specifically ISO/IEC 10646:2011: [...] > I know it takes awhile for implementations to catch up with standards, but it > would be a shame if a 2012 revision of the Ada *standard* ends up referring > to a 9-year old and outdated version of 10646 to get its definitions of > UTF-8 and UTF-16.
The Ada 2012 effort, and the AIs mentioned in the ARM, predate 10646:2011. At this point everything's already settled, I think. Juanma
