Am Samstag, den 28.04.2012, 15:56 +0100 schrieb Richard Wordingham: > However, there does not appear to be anything for *CUNEIFORM NUMERIC > SIGN TWO U, for which one might expect *CUNEIFORM SIGN MAN (Borger 2003 > no. 708). > > So, how does one distinguish '20' from '610' (= 10×60 + 10)? I > resorted to distinguishing them as <U+1230B,U+1230B> and <U+1230B, > U+200A HAIR SPACE, U+1230B>, though I only used HAIR SPACE because > U+2009 THIN SPACE was not available. However, should '20' perhaps be > encoded as <U+1230B,ZWJ,U+1230B>? Should there actually be a CUNEIFORM > NUMERIC SIGN TWO U?
One is not compelled to construct U+3039 (〹) ,twenty' from two U+3038 (〸) ,ten', so a CUNEIFORM TWO U may well be missing. Michael
