2012/6/2 Asmus Freytag <[email protected]>: > While those things might be nice, the fact that this whole infrastructure > doesn't exist is the clearest indication that none of these are anywhere > close to being ready for encoding as characters, let alone being considered > in an encoding *standard*. > > They continue to be solutions in search of a problem.
That's your opinion, most solutions already exist, for a problem that does not need to be "searched"... How could there be some existing solutions (though not interoperable), if there was no such problem? In that case I can retuen the argument about the existing language tags that were encoded without any need for including them, as they were designed clearly at the wrong level. The main problem to solve here is the interoperabiity of the various solutions adopted (and where this nightmare should find an end, preserving the intended semantics) So I really won't support your argument, which I find in fact abusive and irrespectful.
