Le 03/06/12 05:45, Jean-François Colson a écrit :

Read http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3727.pdf . This mechanism is part of Unicode, and adding another one such as Philippe's to accomplish basically the same thing would be a form of duplicate encoding.

Nice! But that is restricted to two-letter codes. That system provides no way to encode the flag of Québec.
Phillipe’s system would be more comprehensive.

At least we could complete those 26 regional indicator symbols with 10 digits, a hyphen and, perhaps, a few possible additional regional indicator symbols as required.
The minimum set of additions would be, for example,
1F650    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL DIGIT ZERO
1F651    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL DIGIT ONE
1F652    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL DIGIT TWO
1F653    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL DIGIT THREE
1F654    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL DIGIT FOUR
1F655    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL DIGIT FIVE
1F656    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL DIGIT SIX
1F657    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL DIGIT SEVEN
1F658    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL DIGIT EIGHT
1F659    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL DIGIT NINE
1F65A    REGIONAL INDICATOR SYMBOL HYPHEN

But that would be difficult (not impossible) to parse because the length varies following the countries. That’s why I think Philippe’s idea, with distinct initial, medial and final symbols, would be better.

JF

Reply via email to