On 9 Jun 2012, at 23:08, Doug Ewell wrote: > But I think this is a matter of UTC and WG2 determining whether the script is > in actual use, not of determining whether it is a "good" script in terms of > the criteria that Stephan Stiller laid out.
One thing I would consider is the fact that most of the "new" scripts which have been encoded experienced stages of development. Bamum, for instance. Something as complex (and arguably unwieldy) as this one... we would want to see some practical examples of how and where it is in use by more than the inventor. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
