On 9 Jun 2012, at 23:58, Doug Ewell wrote: > Michael Everson wrote: > >> we would want to see some practical examples of how and where it is in use >> by more than the inventor. > > Yes, but that's true for all proposals, isn't it? Otherwise Ewellic would > qualify.
Not really. We have lots of "rarely" used characters encoded. The question here is: Since Mandombe is intended for modern, living use, but is extraordinarily complex, is it like other neo-scripts and will it be subject to modification after use? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
