Markus brought to my attention that the clause didn't capture what the UTC decided; he's been out of town, and we're meeting tomorrow to go through all the issues.
------------------------------ Mark <https://plus.google.com/114199149796022210033> * * *— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —* ** On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Richard Wordingham < [email protected]> wrote: > Are the collation tests meant to have been updated for the change in > the draft of Step 2.1 of the collation algorithm? I haven't changed > what I believe to be a UCA 6.1.0-compliant implementation, yet my code > now passes the 6.2.0 tests for both DUCET and CLDR root. (I understand > that the error in one of the UCA 6.1.0 tests has been reported on my > behalf.) >
