On 12 Jul 2012, at 22:20, Julian Bradfield wrote: > But wanting to do so would be crazy. My mu-nu ligature is, as far as I know, > used only by me (and co-authors who let me do the typesetting), and so if > Unicode has any sanity left, it would not encode it.
Is it in print? > My colleagues in the Edinburgh PEPA group did try to get their pet symbol > encoded (a bowtie where the two triangles overlap somewhat rather than just > touching), but were refused; although that symbol now appears in hundreds of > papers by dozens of authors from all over the world. If so, then it should be encoded. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
