On 2 Oct 2012, at 21:40, Doug Ewell wrote: > But referencing the 1993 version of ISO 10646-1, or claiming that MS-DOS code > page 437 is "the standard United States character set" in 2012 and that it > "conforms" to 8859-1 and 10646, helps nobody.
It's not that it helps nobody. It's just that it's WRONG. Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
